Expand description
The recovery lattice (PSP-9 system 11, Paper III Definition 8.1 and Theorem 6).
Rejection is the steady state of a stochastic proposer, so recovery must
terminate by construction. Definition 8.1’s well-formedness conditions
are adopted literally, because the b + k count is a consequence of them:
- One pool, every level.
bis a single non-replenishing budget shared across the whole cascade. Every horizontal repetition consumes one unit — a second fallback route, a second refinement, and a second escalation each cost one unit exactly as a re-proposal does. A per-level budget (including a separate “refinement depth” counter) would giveΣ_λ b_λ + k, notb + k; refinement depth is a cap on level-2 repetitions within the shared pool, never its own pool. - Exhaustion forbids repetition. With zero remaining budget below the top level, the next non-terminal control MUST strictly escalate.
- The top level is unconditionally terminating.
Structs§
- Granted
Control - What the cascade granted for one requested control.
- Recovery
Cascade - The shared-pool cascade for one node (Definition 8.1).
Enums§
- Cascade
Class - Theorem 6’s four terminal classes. Recorded alongside — not in place of —
the node’s Paper II
NodeTerminalOutcome. - Cascade
Level - The escalation chain.
kis the number of strict escalations available from level 0, i.e.Contain as u8. - Failure
Kind - A failure observation’s deterministic classification. The classifier is
total: unknown classes map to
CascadeLevel::Contain.
Functions§
- classify_
failure - Map every failure class to its entry control (PSP-9 system 11). Total by construction — the compiler enforces it.